Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Responses to provision of personalised cancer risk information: a qualitative interview study with members of the public

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Koutoukidis
16 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Cochrane
14 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Usher-Smith
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Koutoukidis
26 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Cochrane
29 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Usher-Smith
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Juliet Usher-Smith
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4985-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement