Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Ability of ecological deprivation indices to measure social inequalities in a French cohort

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Exeter
1 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Megan Sandel
6 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Finn Diderichsen
9 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Sofia Temam
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Abel
20 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Yip
11 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Sofia Temam
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kawika Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4967-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement