This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Motivations and barriers to uptake and use of female-initiated, biomedical HIV prevention products in sub-Saharan Africa: an adapted meta-ethnography
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 October 2016
Accepted: 29 November 2017
Published: 19 December 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Robyn Eakle|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - K. Rivet Amico|
|6 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Graham|
|7 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - J. Craig Phillips|
|21 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Robyn Eakle|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 Dec 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4959-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.