Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence, incidence, and relative odds of overweight or obesity by year and group allocation

From: Healthy apple program to support child care centers to alter nutrition and physical activity practices and improve child weight: a cluster randomized trial

 

Baseline

Implementation

year 1

Follow-up

Implementation

year 2

Year

2011–2012

2012–2013

2013–2014

2014–2015

Group allocation

CCHP +HAP

(n = 522)

CCHP +HAP Delayed

(n = 380)

 

CCHP +HAP

(n = 430)

CCHP +HAP Delayed

(n = 361)

 

CCHP +HAP

(n = 529)

CCHP +HAP Delayed (n = 416)

 

CCHP +HAP

(n = 502)

CCHP +HAP Delayed (n = 353)

 

HAP exposure

No

No

.

Yes

No

 

No

No

 

Yes

Yes

 

%

%

Adj. OR

(95%CI)

%

%

Adj. OR

(95%CI)

%

%

Adj. OR

(95%CI)

%

%

Adj. OR

(95%CI)

Prevalence of overweight or obesity in the Autumn

 Age, y

  2–5

13

20

0.6

(0.4–0.9)*

22

33

0.6

(0.4–0.9)*

27

28

0.9

(0.6–1.5)

26

29

0.8

(0.5–1.2)

  3

10

16

0.6

(0.3–1.3)

22

33

0.6

(0.4–0.9)*

28

28

1.0

(0.6–1.8)

27

32

0.8

(0.5–1.4)

  4

17

26

0.6

(0.4–1.0)*

22

35

0.5

(0.3–0.9)*

27

30

0.8

(0.5–1.4)

29

32

0.9

(0.5–1.4)

Incidence of overweight or obesity between Autumn and Spring

 Age, y

  2–5

3.8

3.6

1.1

(0.5–2.3)

8.1

10.3

0.7

(0.3–1.5)

5.2

6.7

0.7

(0.4–1.2)

6.0

1.6

5.0

(1.2–1.4)*

  3

3.2

3.9

0.8

(0.3–2.4)

5.0

9.6

0.4

(0.1–1.1)

6.8

6.5

1.2

(0.4–3.5)

7.0

1.1

9.1

(0.9–92.6)

  4

4.3

3.1

1.4

(0.4–5.7)

10.2

8.8

1.2

(0.4–3.9)

4.2

7.1

0.4

(0.2–0.9)*

5.0

2.9

2.4

(0.4–12.7)

  1. Study time was defined according to academic calendar year. CCHP Child Care Health Program, HAP Healthy Apple Program; Child care centers were randomly allocated to the CCHP + HAP or CCHP + HAP Delayed group in Autumn 2012; n: number of children; Adj. OR (95%CI): Adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval; Overweight or obese was defined as age-and sex-specific BMI percentile ≥85%; Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using year-specific logistic regression models with robust standard errors, controlling for age, sex, and/or Autumn status; *Estimates for CCHP + HAP centers differed significantly from CCHP + HAP Delayed centers (reference), P < 0.05