Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Views of policy makers and health promotion professionals on factors facilitating implementation and maintenance of interventions and policies promoting physical activity and healthy eating: results of the DEDIPAC project

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luke Wolfenden
17 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Saskia Muellmann
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kay (Nobuko) Hongu
6 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Saskia Muellmann
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kay (Nobuko) Hongu
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4929-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement