Skip to main content

Table 4 Sensitivity analysis of the prospective associations between adherence to the Healthy Dietary Adherence Score (divided into quartiles) at baseline and indicators of psychosocial well-being at follow-up (N = 7196)

From: Bidirectional associations between psychosocial well-being and adherence to healthy dietary guidelines in European children: prospective findings from the IDEFICS study

 

KINDL®

SDQ

 

Better self-esteem

Good parent relations

No detectable emotional problems

No detectable peer problems

HDAS†

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

OR

95% CI

Q4 (>28)

1.2

1.0–1.5

1.2

1.0–1.5

1.4

1.2–1.6

1.3

1.1–1.6

Q3 (21–27)

1.2

1.0–1.4

1.1

0.9–1.3

1.3

1.1–1.5

1.3

1.1–1.4

Q2 (16–20)

0.9

0.8–1.1

1.1

0.9–1.3

1.2

1.1–1.4

1.0

0.9–1.2

Q1 (<15)

reference

reference

reference

reference

  1. OR and CI obtained using a multilevel model correcting for cluster design (country)
  2. Model adjusted for: age, sex, BMI z-score, well-being at baseline, and highest parental education and income
  3. †HDAS ranges from 0 to 49
  4. HDAS Healthy Dietary Adherence Score; OR Odds ratio; SDQ Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us