Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics at baseline and follow-up in the complete sample (N = 7675)

From: Bidirectional associations between psychosocial well-being and adherence to healthy dietary guidelines in European children: prospective findings from the IDEFICS study

 

Baseline 2007/2008

Follow-up 2009/2010

 

mean ± SD

min., max.

IQR

mean ± SD

min., max.

IQR

Age (years)

6.0 (1.8)

2.0;9.7

4.4;7.6

8.0 (1.8)

3.9;11.8

6.4;9.5

BMI z-score1

0.3 (1.2)

−5.4;5.8

−0.5;1.0

0.4 (1.2)

−6.6;4.7

−0.4;1.2

Self-esteem score (KINDL®)

89.4 (10.4)

25.0;100.0

81.3;100.0

87.0 (10.7)

25.0;100.0

81.3;93.8

Parent relations score (KINDL®)

84.8 (10.2)

43.8;100.0

75.0;93.8

83.9 (10.5)

25.0;100.0

75.0;93.8

Emotional problems score (SDQ)

1.6 (1.7)

0.0;10.0

0.0;2.0

1.6 (1.7)

0.0;10.0

0.0;2.0

Peer problems score (SDQ)

1.3 (1.5)

0.0;10.0

0.0;2.0

1.2 (1.5)

0.0;10.0

0.0;2.0

HDAS

22.0 (9.0)

0.0;49.0

16.0;28.0

23.0 (9.0)

0.0;49.0

17.0;28.0

 

n

%

 

n

%

 

Sex of the child (male)

3894

51

 

3894

51

 

Overweight (including obese)

1385

18

 

1727

23

 

Higher parental education level2

4480

59

 

4572

60

 

Higher parental income level3

3738

52

 

4259

60

 

Indicators of well-being

 Better self-esteem (KINDL®)Δ

4086

53

 

4702

61

 

Good parent relations (KINDL®)Δ

3914

51

 

3824

50

 

 No detectable emotional problems (SDQ)Λ

6625

86

 

6620

86

 

 No detectable peer problems (SDQ)Λ

6194

81

 

6349

83

 

Healthy Dietary Adherence Score

 Total HDAS (higher adherence)†

4017

52

 

3970

52

 

HDAS components (higher adherence)

 fruits & vegetables

4983

65

 

4993

65

 

 fish

5383

71

 

5315

70

 

 whole meal

4011

52

 

4217

56

 

 sugar

1642

21

 

1868

24

 

 fat

4846

63

 

4196

55

 
  1. 1BMI z-score calculated based on the method proposed by the International Obesity Task Force [29]
  2. 2Post-secondary education
  3. 3Country-specific reference to the average net equivalence income, considering the median income and poverty line
  4. ΔCut-off values for Better self-esteem ≥ 87.50 (both sexes) and Good parent relations > 83.58(m)/84.40(f)
  5. ΛCut-off values for No detectable emotional problems ≤ 3 and No detectable peer problems ≤ 2
  6. †Cut-off value for Higher adherence to the HDAS ≥ 21 at baseline and ≥ 22 at follow-up
  7. IQR Interquartile Range; SD standard deviation; SDQ Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; HDAS Healthy Dietary Adherence Score