Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Social-cognitive determinants of the tick check: a cross-sectional study on self-protective behavior in combatting Lyme disease

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tiet-Hanh Dao-Tran
1 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Albert Yeung
5 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolina Judith Klett-Tammen
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oscar Armando Esparza
10 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Amy van der Heijden
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carolina Judith Klett-Tammen
12 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tiet-Hanh Dao-Tran
26 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Amy van der Heijden
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Amy van der Heijden
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
25 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4908-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement