Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Using a monitoring and evaluation framework to improve study efficiency and quality during a prospective cohort study in infants receiving rotavirus vaccination in El Alto, Bolivia: the Infant Nutrition, Inflammation, and Diarrheal Illness (NIDI) study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anita van den Biggelaar
25 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aditi Dey
3 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anna Marie Aceituno
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anna Marie Aceituno
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4904-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement