This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Using a monitoring and evaluation framework to improve study efficiency and quality during a prospective cohort study in infants receiving rotavirus vaccination in El Alto, Bolivia: the Infant Nutrition, Inflammation, and Diarrheal Illness (NIDI) study
- Anna M. Aceituno†1, 2Email author,
- Kaitlyn K. Stanhope†3,
- Paulina A. Rebolledo2, 4,
- Rachel M. Burke3,
- Rita Revollo5,
- Volga Iñiguez6,
- Parminder S. Suchdev2, 4, 7 and
- Juan S. Leon2
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 23 March 2017
Accepted: 12 November 2017
Published: 28 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anita van den Biggelaar|
|25 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aditi Dey|
|3 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Marie Aceituno|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Marie Aceituno|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|28 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4904-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.