This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Impact of a decision aid about stratified ovarian cancer risk-management on women’s knowledge and intentions: a randomised online experimental survey study
- Susanne F. Meisel1, 2,
- Maddie Freeman1,
- Jo Waller1,
- Lindsay Fraser3,
- Sue Gessler3,
- Ian Jacobs4,
- Jatinderpal Kalsi3,
- Ranjit Manchanda3,
- Belinda Rahman3,
- Lucy Side6,
- Jane Wardle^1,
- Anne Lanceley3,
- Saskia C. Sanderson1, 5Email author and
- on behalf of the PROMISE team
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 April 2017
Accepted: 6 November 2017
Published: 16 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fernando Guerra|
|12 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Khan|
|29 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Meisel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Meisel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4889-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.