This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 March 2017
Accepted: 6 November 2017
Published: 15 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Duncan Macfarlane|
|11 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippa Dall|
|25 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Maher|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Philippa Dall|
|3 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Carol Maher|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4888-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.