This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Ideas, actors and institutions: lessons from South Australian Health in All Policies on what encourages other sectors’ involvement
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 February 2017
Accepted: 4 October 2017
Published: 16 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Hunter|
|3 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenni Judd|
|5 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brenda Gamble|
|7 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Fran Baum|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Hunter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4821-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.