This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
How participants report their health status: cognitive interviews of self-rated health across race/ethnicity, gender, age, and educational attainment
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 April 2017
Accepted: 14 September 2017
Published: 4 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephen Schensul|
|8 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Astrid Knoblauch|
|19 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roya Sherafat|
|15 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dana Garbarski|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Astrid Knoblauch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4761-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.