This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Modelling the effects of booster dose vaccination schedules and recommendations for public health immunization programs: the case of Haemophilus influenzae serotype b
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 June 2016
Accepted: 5 September 2017
Published: 13 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fiona Russell|
|14 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rob Menzies|
|1 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Seyed Moghadas|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rob Menzies|
|24 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carl T. D'Angio|
|11 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Charania|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nadia Charania|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|4 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|13 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4714-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.