Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Modelling the effects of booster dose vaccination schedules and recommendations for public health immunization programs: the case of Haemophilus influenzae serotype b

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Russell
14 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Menzies
1 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Seyed Moghadas
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rob Menzies
24 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carl T. D'Angio
11 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Charania
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nadia Charania
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4714-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement