Skip to main content

Table 2 Competing risk regression models of risk of cancer death, by remoteness, socio-economic disadvantage and country of birth category, NSW 1980–2008

From: Cancer survival disparities worsening by socio-economic disadvantage over the last 3 decades in new South Wales, Australia

 

Unadjusted

Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3b

Remoteness

SHR (95% CI)

SHR (95% CI)

SHR (95% CI)

SHR (95% CI)

 Major cities

1

1

1

1

 Inner regional

0.98 (0.97–0.99)

0.97 (0.96–0.98)

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

1.01 (1.00–1.02)

 Outer regional/ Remote

1.06 (1.04–1.07)

1.02 (1.01–1.04)

1.04 (1.03–1.06)

1.05 (1.03–1.06)

SEIFA quintile

 1 (least disadvantaged)

1

1

1

1

 2

1.14 (1.13–1.16)

1.11 (1.10–1.13)

1.05 (1.04–1.07)

1.04 (1.02–1.06)

 3

1.26 (1.24–1.28)

1.19 (1.18–1.21)

1.09 (1.07–1.10)

1.08 (1.06–1.09)

 4

1.35 (1.33–1.36)

1.26 (1.25–1.28)

1.12 (1.11–1.14)

1.11 (1.09–1.12)

 5 (most disadvantaged)

1.46 (1.44–1.47)

1.37 (1.35–1.39)

1.17 (1.16–1.19)

1.15 (1.13–1.17)

Country of birth

 Australia

1

1

1

1

 Other English speaking

1.14 (1.12–1.15)

1.10 (1.08–1.10)

1.00 (1.00–1.02)

0.99 (0.98–1.01)

 Non-English speaking

1.01 (1.00–1.03)

1.09 (1.08–1.10)

0.93 (0.92–0.94)

0.91 (0.90–0.92)

 Unknown

0.11 (0.11–0.11)

0.14 (0.13–0.14)

0.20 (0.19–0.21)

0.23 (0.22–0.24)

  1. SEIFA Socio-Economic Index for Areas, SHR Sub-hazard ratio, CI Confidence interval; Country of birth categorised into Australia, other English-speaking and non-English speaking countries and unknown
  2. aModel 1 adjusted for sex, age, diagnostic period and, as appropriate, for remoteness/SEIFA quintile/country of birth
  3. bModel 2 further adjusted for cancer site and Model 3 further adjusted for summary stage