Skip to main content

Table 1 Walking Cities’ data against which the SEF tool was evaluated

From: Missed opportunities in the evaluation of public health interventions: a case study of physical activity programmes

Source

Documents

Department of Health

➢ Invitation to submit proposal for additional revenue funding for walking as a supplement to the Cycle City Ambition Grant (guidance document)

➢ Cycle City Revenue funding for Walking application form (the bid document)

Birmingham City Council

➢ Walking Revolution. Cycle City Revenue funding for Walking bid document

➢ Creating more active communities. Walking cities final report: summary and recommendations (Birmingham, Leeds and Bradford and Norwich combined report by Living Streetsa)

Cambridgeshire County Council

➢ Walk Local. Cycle City Revenue funding for Walking bid document

➢ End of funding reports from 5 individual projects: Walk Buggy; Walk Health; Walk Work; Walk School; Walk Aware

Leeds City Council and the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council

➢ Best Foot Forward. Cycle City Revenue funding for Walking bid document

➢ Creating more active communities. Walking cities final report: summary and recommendations (Birmingham, Leeds and Bradford and Norwich combined report by Living Streetsa)

Greater Manchester authorities

➢ Get Active in Greater Manchester. Cycle City Revenue funding for Walking bid document

➢ Get Active in Greater Manchester evaluation report (general)

➢ Individual evaluations for 8 projects

Norwich City Council

➢ Walk to. Cycle City Revenue funding for Walking bid document

➢ Creating more active communities. Walking cities final report: summary and recommendations (Birmingham, Leeds and Bradford and Norwich combined report by Living Streetsa)

➢ Walk Norwich Programme Report

  1. aLiving Streets ran the walking project in 3 of the cities https://www.livingstreets.org.uk/