Missed opportunities in the evaluation of public health interventions: a case study of physical activity programmes
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lyndal Bond|
|28 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Tabak|
|4 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Beehler|
|1 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Hanson|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachel Tabak|
|5 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah Beehler|
|2 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah Hanson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4683-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.