Table 4 Unstandardized and standardized loading for measurement model of community engagement, peer norms and self-efficacy among online high-risk MSM in China (n = 1042)
Parameter estimate | Unstandardized loading(SE) | Standardized loading |
|---|---|---|
Engagement → I1 | 1.000 | 0.809 |
Engagement → I2 | 0.902 (0.052)*** | 0.745 |
Engagement → I3 | 0.700 (0.045)*** | 0.566 |
Engagement → I4 | 1.088 (0.047)*** | 0.880 |
Engagement → I5 | 1.088 (0.052)*** | 0.880 |
Engagement → I6 | 0.667 (0.051)*** | 0.539 |
Engagement → I7 | 0.697 (0.051)*** | 0.564 |
Engagement → I8 | 0.580 (0.053)*** | 0.469 |
Peer norms → F3 | 1.000 | 0.229 |
Peer norms → F4 | 2.507 (0.336)*** | 0.574 |
Peer norms → F5 | 2.650 (0.356)*** | 0.606 |
Peer norms → F6 | 3.740 (0.494)*** | 0.856 |
Peer norms → F7 | 3.827 (0.501)*** | 0.875 |
Peer norms → F8 | 4.086 (0.538)*** | 0.935 |
Self-efficacy → F9 | 1.000 | 0.727 |
Self-efficacy → F10 | 0.932 (0.033)*** | 0.678 |
Self-efficacy → F11 | 0.963 (0.033)*** | 0.700 |
Self-efficacy → F12 | 1.048 (0.031)*** | 0.761 |
Self-efficacy → F13 | 0.993 (0.029)*** | 0.721 |
Self-efficacy → F14 | 0.958 (0.030)*** | 0.696 |
Self-efficacy → F15 | 0.954 (0.031)*** | 0.694 |