Skip to main content

Table 1 General opinions and recall of PWLs

From: Informing tobacco control policy in Jordan: assessing the effectiveness of pictorial warning labels on cigarette packs

 

Smokers (n = 309)

Non-smokers (n = 611)

P-value

Respondents’ opinions on the harms of smoking and the need for warnings

Smoking is harmful to smokers

  

< 0.0001

  Agree

76.7% (237)

91.7% (560)

 

  Neutral or disagree

23.3% (72)

8.3% (51)

 

Smoking is harmful to non-smokers

  

< 0.0001

  Agree

79.0% (244)

92.0% (562)

 

  Neutral or disagree

21.0% (65)

8.0% (49)

 

Placing warnings on cigarette packs is important

  

< 0.0001

  Agree

48.2% (149)

73.0% (446)

 

  Neutral or disagree

51.8% (160)

27.0% (165)

 

Respondents noticing and recalling PWLs in circulation

Have previously seen

  PWL1 (prison)

76.7% (237)

40.6% (248)

 

  PWL2 (child covering mouth)

80.9% (250)

53.2% (325)

 

  PWL3 (child using inhaler)

84.1% (260)

49.9% (305)

 

  PWL4 (coffin)

86.7% (268)

60.7% (371)

 

Recalled at least one statement associated with PWLs on cigarette packs

66.3% (205)

42.1% (257)

< 0.05