|
Region
|
Local Authority
|
Project statusa
|
|---|
|
Number of projects
|
|---|
|
Primary groupsb
|
Secondary groupsc
|
Total
|
Number of groups registeredd
|
Plannede
|
Completedf
|
In progress/ongoingg
|
On holdh
|
Declined to participatei
|
Withdrew post-registrationj
|
|---|
|
London
|
Barking & Dagenham
|
4
|
8
|
12
|
8
|
0
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Redbridge
|
8
|
3
|
11
|
8
|
0
|
1
|
6
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
TOTAL
|
12
|
11
|
23
|
16
| | | | | | |
|
North East England
|
Gateshead
|
5
|
7
|
12
|
12
|
0
|
8
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Newcastle
|
4
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sunderland
|
5
|
0
|
5
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
TOTAL
|
14
|
9
|
23
|
22
| | | | | | |
|
North West England
|
Blackburn with Darwen
|
11
|
14
|
25
|
8
|
5
|
5
|
9
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Bolton
|
10
|
6
|
16
|
6
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
0
|
|
TOTAL
|
21
|
20
|
41
|
14
| | | | | | |
|
West Midlands
|
Dudley
|
7
|
1
|
8
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
|
Sandwell
|
9
|
4
|
13
|
13
|
0
|
3
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
|
Wolverhampton
|
6
|
5
|
11
|
8
|
1
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
TOTAL
|
22
|
10
|
32
|
29
| | | | | | |
|
Yorkshire
|
Doncaster
|
19
|
1
|
20
|
15
|
3
|
8
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
6
|
|
Rotherham
|
15
|
1
|
16
|
14
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
1
|
1
|
5
|
|
TOTAL
|
34
|
2
|
36
|
29
| | | | | | |
|
TOTAL
| |
103 (66.5%)
|
52 (33.5%)
|
155
|
110
|
15 (9.7%)
|
47 (30.3%)
|
48 (31.0%)
|
21 (13.5%)
|
3 (1.9%)
|
21 (13.5%)
|
-
aInformation provided on final implementation log (September 2011)
-
bPrimary groups were the first and main group to be signed up in a community who led the initial activities and environmental changes on the specified route or area
-
cSecondary groups got involved due to their links with the primary group and then became a project in their own right or got involved at a later stage in promoting the use of the improved routes or delivering promotional and awareness-raising activities
-
dCompleted an application form to be part of FFW and officially registered with the intervention
-
ePlanned at the time of the final implementation log
-
fCompleted and officially closed at the time when the final implementation log was provided
-
gOngoing/had not been officially completed at the time of the final completion of the implementation log
-
hOn hold at the time when the final implementation log was provided
-
iGroups showed initial interest in FFW but later decided it did not fit with their interests or plans
-
jGroups withdrawn by the coordinator or withdrew themselves after registering
