Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalence of binge drinking and prevalence ratios for the socioeconomic position (SEP) variables by country, estimated with multilevel Poisson regression models with robust variance among 14–17 years-old students from 6 European cities participating in the SILNE survey, 2013

From: Adolescent alcohol use and parental and adolescent socioeconomic position in six European cities

 

Namur (Belgium)

Tampere (Finland)

Hannover (Germany)

Latina (Italy)

Amersfoort (Netherlands)

Coimbra (Portugal)

%

PR

95%CI

%

PR

95%CI

%

PR

95%CI

%

PR

95%CI

%

PR

95%CI

%

PR

95%CI

Parental education level

 Low level

6.6

1

 

no observations

2.8

1

 

7.4

1

 

5.9

1

 

4.1

1

 

 Middle level

6.5

0.87

(0.71–1.07)

1.8

1

 

5.4

2.11

(0.40–11.15)

5.1

0.83

(0.61–1.13)

4.2

0.74

(0.32–1.71)

3.4

0.83

(0.52–1.32)

 High level

7.7

1.26

(0.71–2.25)

0.6

0.70

(0.21–2.36)

3.1

1.47

(0.33–6.59)

4.3

0.85

(0.53–1.35)

2.9

0.63

(0.26–1.54)

2.0

0.51

(0.17–1.50)

Family Affluence Scale (FAS)

 0–4

6.3

1

 

1.3

1

 

4.6

1

 

6.3

1

 

3.5

1

 

2.7

1

 

 5–7

8.3

1.18

(0.92–1.52)

1.1

0.95

(0.27–3.37)

3.0

0.75

(0.44–1.25)

4.7

0.69

(0.54–0.88)

3.7

1.20

(0.77–1.86)

3.2

1.31

(0.77–2.22)

Academic achievement

 Low (<60%)

9.2

1

 

4.2

1

 

3.3

1

 

14.2

1

 

4.3

1

 

6.5

1

 

 Average (60–69%)

7.9

0.92

(0.44–1.91)

0.3

0.06

(0.01–0.54)

4.9

1.62

(0.67–3.94)

7.9

0.72

(0.39–1.30)

4.1

1.02

(0.66–1.56)

2.4

0.47

(0.17–1.26)

 Good (>70%)

5.2

0.68

(0.45–1.02)

no observations

2.9

1.55

(0.66–3.66)

2.6

0.30

(0.11–0.78)

2.8

0.93

(0.61–1.40)

1.8

0.49

(0.18–1.35)

Student weekly income

 0–5 €

4.1

1

 

no observations

1.3

1

 

3.3

1

 

2.3

1

 

2.1

1

 

 6–20 €

5.4

1.29

(0.90–1.85)

0.9

1

 

1.9

1.34

(0.30–6.04)

5.4

1.51

(0.92–2.50)

1.2

0.43

(0.13–1.48)

2.7

1.31

(0.43–3.96)

  > 20 €

12.1

2.51

(1.49–4.24)

2.2

1.94

(0.94–4.01)

6.4

3.23

(1.00–10.49)

10.5

2.50

(1.28–4.87)

6.2

1.35

(0.63–2.90)

6.9

2.89

(1.29–6.47)

  1. Each model included weekly binge drinking, all SEP indicators and was adjusted by age, gender and migrant background in level 1 and school in level 2
  2. % prevalence; PR prevalence ratio; 95%CI 95% confidence interval