Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: ‘The university should promote health, but not enforce it’: opinions and attitudes about the regulation of sugar-sweetened beverages in a university setting

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie-Claude Paquette
23 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Penny Love
28 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Eloise Howse
Resubmission - Version 2
28 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Eloise Howse
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Eloise Howse
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4626-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement