Skip to main content

Table 1 Evaluation by participants of the components of the MetSLIM lifestyle intervention a

From: A lifestyle intervention study targeting individuals with low socioeconomic status of different ethnic origins: important aspects for successful implementation

  Satisfaction Score (1–10)
Rate MetSLIM lifestyle intervention programme (n = 60) 8.3 (1.3)
Rate dietary consultations (n = 57) 8.5 (1.5)
Rate introductory meeting (n = 56) 7.6 (1.4)
Rate group meeting on label reading (n = 46) 7.7 (1.6)
Rate group meeting on social occasions (n = 39) 7.6 (1.7)
Rate group meeting including the supermarket tour (n = 14) 8.4 (1.6)
Rate group meeting on Ramadan (n = 11) 8.0 (1.9)
Rate group meeting on motivation (n = 18) 8.1 (1.2)
Rate group meetings (n = 54) 7.5 (1.6)
Rate physical activity lessons (n = 55) 8.4 (1.5)
Nice to work on lifestyle in a group (n = 63)
 (very) nice 82.6%
 neutral 15.9%
 not nice (at all) 1.6%
Nice to work on lifestyle close to my home (n = 62)
 I do not live close by 8.1%
 (very) nice 88.7%
 neutral 3.2%
 not nice (at all) 0
Nice to work on lifestyle with people from the neighbourhood (n = 61)
 I do not live close by 6.6%
 (very) nice 80.3%
 neutral 13.1%
 not nice (at all) 0
Nice to make new contacts (n = 63) 55.6%
  1. aValues are expressed as mean ± SD or %