Skip to main content

Table 1 Evaluation by participants of the components of the MetSLIM lifestyle intervention a

From: A lifestyle intervention study targeting individuals with low socioeconomic status of different ethnic origins: important aspects for successful implementation

 

Satisfaction Score (1–10)

Rate MetSLIM lifestyle intervention programme (n = 60)

8.3 (1.3)

Rate dietary consultations (n = 57)

8.5 (1.5)

Rate introductory meeting (n = 56)

7.6 (1.4)

Rate group meeting on label reading (n = 46)

7.7 (1.6)

Rate group meeting on social occasions (n = 39)

7.6 (1.7)

Rate group meeting including the supermarket tour (n = 14)

8.4 (1.6)

Rate group meeting on Ramadan (n = 11)

8.0 (1.9)

Rate group meeting on motivation (n = 18)

8.1 (1.2)

Rate group meetings (n = 54)

7.5 (1.6)

Rate physical activity lessons (n = 55)

8.4 (1.5)

Nice to work on lifestyle in a group (n = 63)

 (very) nice

82.6%

 neutral

15.9%

 not nice (at all)

1.6%

Nice to work on lifestyle close to my home (n = 62)

 I do not live close by

8.1%

 (very) nice

88.7%

 neutral

3.2%

 not nice (at all)

0

Nice to work on lifestyle with people from the neighbourhood (n = 61)

 I do not live close by

6.6%

 (very) nice

80.3%

 neutral

13.1%

 not nice (at all)

0

Nice to make new contacts (n = 63)

55.6%

  1. aValues are expressed as mean ± SD or %