Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The 2016 HIGh Heels: Health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nachiappan Chockalingam
22 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Neil Cronin
30 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cylie Williams
22 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Maxwell Barnish
Resubmission - Version 2
22 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nachiappan Chockalingam
18 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cylie Williams
30 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Maxwell Barnish
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Maxwell Barnish
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4573-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement