This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The 2016 HIGh Heels: Health effects And psychosexual BenefITS (HIGH HABITS) study: systematic review of reviews and additional primary studies
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 December 2016
Accepted: 6 July 2017
Published: 1 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nachiappan Chockalingam|
|22 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Neil Cronin|
|30 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cylie Williams|
|22 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maxwell Barnish|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nachiappan Chockalingam|
|18 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cylie Williams|
|30 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maxwell Barnish|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Maxwell Barnish|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4573-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.