Skip to content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Recruitment of racial/ethnic minority older adults through community sites for focus group discussions

  • Mary E. Northridge1, 2, 3, 4Email author,
  • Michele Shedlin5,
  • Eric W. Schrimshaw2,
  • Ivette Estrada2, 3,
  • Leydis De La Cruz3,
  • Rogelina Peralta3,
  • Stacia Birdsall5,
  • Sara S. Metcalf4,
  • Bibhas Chakraborty6 and
  • Carol Kunzel2, 3
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:563

Received: 1 March 2017

Accepted: 1 June 2017

Published: 9 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mary Northridge
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4482-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Epidemiology & Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, USA
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA
Columbia University College of Dental Medicine, Section of Population Oral Health, New York, USA
Department of Geography, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, USA
New York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, USA
Duke-National University of Singapore (Duke-NUS) Medical School, Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Singapore, Singapore