Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a geo-specific poster compared to a general poster for effecting change in perceived threat and intention to avoid drowning ‘hotspots’ among children of migrant workers: evidence from Ningbo, China

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yinchao Zhu
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shuling Gao
6 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michaela Goodwin
18 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Constance A Gewa
20 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yinchao Zhu
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yinchao Zhu
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yinchao Zhu
Resubmission - Version 5
22 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 May 2017 Editorially accepted
30 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4462-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement