Vitamin D levels and deficiency with different occupations: a systematic review
- Daniel Sowah†1,
- Xiangning Fan†1,
- Liz Dennett2,
- Reidar Hagtvedt3 and
- Sebastian Straube1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 22 August 2016
Accepted: 15 May 2017
Published: 22 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|22 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Sowah|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - KATHRYN HART|
|27 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Farrar|
|24 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Sowah|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - KATHRYN HART|
|13 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Farrar|
|9 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Daniel Sowah|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4436-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.