Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A cross-sectional analysis of green space prevalence and mental wellbeing in England

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter James
22 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilma Zijlema
4 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Houlden
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilma Zijlema
29 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter James
12 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Houlden
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilma Zijlema
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter James
8 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Houlden
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Houlden
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Victoria Houlden
Resubmission - Version 6
7 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
9 May 2017 Editorially accepted
17 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4401-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement