Skip to main content

Table 2 Appropriate treatment overall, RDT-positive and RDT-negative results

From: Use of malaria RDTs in various health contexts across sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review

Author

Year

Appropriate Treatment (%)

Positives Treated (%)

Negatives Not Treated (%)

Formal Health Care Sector

 Bastiaens

2011

90.4%

100.0%

90.0%

 Batwala

2011

88.5%

100.0%

76.6%

 Bisoffi

2009

60.7%

97.7%

19.0%

 Bottieau

2013

93.4%

95.1%

92.8%

 Chinkhumba

2010

86.9%

98.0%

57.9%

 Cundill

2015

91.4%

80.3%

95.1%

 Hamer

2007

78.7%

96.6%

64.5%

 Masanja

2010

95.9%

95.8%

96.0%

 Mbacham a

2014

56.1%

72.1%

48.1%

 Mbacham b

2014

70.8%

72.9%

69.4%

 Nicastri

2009

66.4%

55.6%

67.0%

 Reyburn

2007

54.4%

98.9%

46.3%

 Shakely

2013

99.9%

100.0%

99.9%

 Skarbinski

2009

88.0%

92.9%

87.2%

 Uzochukwu

2011

60.0%

100.0%

25.9%

Retail Sector

 Ansah

2015

97.7%

99.5%

93.8%

 Awor

2015

91.1%

93.5%

82.8%

 Cohen

2015

80.0%

83.3%

56.3%

 Ikwuobe

2013

55.4%

100.0%

48.4%

 Mbonye

2015

98.8%

99.0%

98.5%

Community Health Workers

 Chanda

2011

98.4%

98.4%

98.4%

 Hamainza

2014

83.2%

61.6%

98.0%

 Hamer

2012

99.3%

98.5%

99.6%

 Mubi

2011

96.8%

99.7%

93.9%

 Mukanga

2011

96.7%

96.5%

97.5%

 Mukanga

2012

99.1%

99.9%

95.1%

 Thiam

2012

-

96.6%

-

  1. ‘a’ denotes appropriate treatment for clinicians in the basic intervention group of the Mbacham study; ‘b’ denotes appropriate treatment for clinicians in the enhanced intervention group of the Mbacham study [80]. Thiam and colleagues did not report the number of negatives not treated, making the calculation of the total amount of appropriate treatment inappropriate [84]