Correcting for day of the week and public holiday effects: improving a national daily syndromic surveillance service for detecting public health threats
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 August 2016
Accepted: 7 May 2017
Published: 19 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Stefanik|
|26 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Stefanik|
|21 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Elizabeth Buckingham-Jeffery|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Victor Doctor|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|19 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4372-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.