From: Sex differences in the association of social network satisfaction and the risk for type 2 diabetes
 |  | Living in a partnership | Living alone | Socially connected | Socially isolated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | SNS | HR (95% CI) p value | HR (95% CI) p value | HR (95% CI) p value | HR (95% CI) p value |
Model 1 | moderate | 1.13 (0.82–1.56) 0.465 | 0.75 (0.45–1.25) 0.274 | 1.60 (1.06–2.42) 0.025 | 0.70 (0.48–1.00) 0.051 |
low | 2.41 (1.16–5.01) 0.018 | 0.35 (0.05–2.55) 0.301 | N/A* | 1.33 (0.66–2.68) 0.424 | |
p for interaction | 0.191 (moderate), 0.075 (low) | 0.003 (moderate) | |||
Model 2 | moderate | 1.20 (0.86–1.67) 0.278 | 0.80 (0.48–1.34) 0.403 | 1.57 (1.03–2.37) 0.034 | 0.77 (0.53–1.12) 0.168 |
low | 2.22 (1.06–4.64) 0.034 | 0.28 (0.04–2.07) 0.212 | N/A* | 1.25 (0.62–2.53) 0.538 | |
p for interaction | 0.194 (moderate), 0.046 (low) | 0.007 (moderate) | |||
Model 3 | moderate | 1.17 (0.84–1.63) 0.355 | 0.76 (0.44–1.29) 0.308 | 1.56 (1.01–2.39) 0.044 | 0.74 (0.51–1.08) 0.120 |
low | 2.11 (1.00–4.44) 0.049 | 0.27 (0.04–1.98) 0.196 | N/A* | 1.17 (0.57–2.39) 0.675 | |
p for interaction | 0.186 (moderate) 0.047 (low) | 0.010 (moderate) |