Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimates of cross price elasticity of demand for PT with respect to fuel price, focusing on Australian values

From: Obesity-related health impacts of fuel excise taxation- an evidence review and cost-effectiveness study

Source Type of study Estimate
BITRE database [33], Table 1D03 Cited from study by Goodwin [101] 0.34
BITRE database [33], Table 2D18 Cited from studies by Cervero 1990 and Wang & Skinner 1984
(further details not given)
0.08 to 0.80
Currie & Phung 2006 [74] Review within primary study 0.07 to 0.8
Currie & Phung 2008 [75] Review within primary study LR: 0.07 to 0.30
Holmgren 2007 [78] Review
Meta-analysis
0.38 (s.e 0.31)
SR: 0.82 (95% UI 0.56 to 1.08)
LR: 1.15 (95% UI 0.65 to 1.65)
Kennedy & Wallis 2007 [76] Review 0 to 0.20
Litman 2016 [73] Non-systematic review SR: 0.05 to 0.15
LR: 0.2 to 0.4
Luk & Hepburn 1993 [77] Review SR: 0.07
  1. Table notes: BITRE Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics, LR long-run, s.e standard error, SR short-run, UI uncertainty interval