[4]
|
Davies, K. et al. 2010
|
England
|
Quantitative, descriptive study on recruitment methods
|
Oldest old, ≥85 years
|
Family involvement, trust and respect, recruitment and maintenance strategy, location, flexible assessment, participant consent strategy
|
Mortality risk, poor health, unwillingness, interfering family members
|
[25]
|
Dyall, L. et al. 2013
|
New Zealand
|
Quantitative, structured questionnaires, descriptive study on recruitment methods
|
Oldest oldand BME (Māori), ≥85 years
|
Family involvement, trust and respect, recruitment and maintenance strategy
|
Mortality risk, poor health, unwillingness
|
[26]
|
Ewart, C.V. et al. 2001
|
United States
|
Quantitative, descriptive study on recruitment methods
|
Oldest old, 65–105 years
|
Trust and respect, recruitment and maintenance strategy, flexible assessment
|
Mortality risk, poor health, unwillingness, interfering family members, poor location
|
[5]
|
Pascucci, M. et al. 2012
|
United States
|
Quantitative, descriptive study and structured survey
|
Oldest old, 80–101 years
|
None
|
Poor health, poor location
|
[44]
|
Buijs, R. et al. 2003
|
Canada
|
Qualitative, focus groups and individual interviews
|
Deprived area, 61–90 years
|
Motivation, adaptable service
|
Poor health, lack of interest
|
[40]
|
Martinez, I.L. et al. 2009
|
United States
|
Qualitative, focus groups
|
Deprived area and BME (African American), 61–89 years
|
Motivation, free food
|
Poor health, inaccessibility, costs
|
[21]
|
Mills, K.M. et al. 1996
|
United States
|
Quantitative, descriptive study and structured interviews
|
Deprived area, ≥62 years
|
Introductory meeting at the housing estate
|
Poor health, lack of interest, letter invitation
|