Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improving immunization in Afghanistan: results from a cross-sectional community-based survey to assess routine immunization coverage

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Raveesha R Mugali
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nyuyki Kufe
29 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Palenik
10 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Raveesha R Mugali
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Palenik
16 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nyuyki Kufe
10 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Raveesha R Mugali
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charles Palenik
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Raveesha R Mugali
Resubmission - Version 6
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4193-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement