This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 17 April 2016
Accepted: 16 March 2017
Published: 23 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Apolinaras Zaborskis|
|29 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tanmay Mahapatra|
|1 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patricia ChiaoTzu Lee|
|1 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kei Long Cheung|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Jun 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tanmay Mahapatra|
|4 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Håkan Källmén|
|19 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kei Long Cheung|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Håkan Källmén|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|16 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-017-4189-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.