Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The impact of non-response bias due to sampling in public health studies: A comparison of voluntary versus mandatory recruitment in a Dutch national survey on adolescent health

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Apolinaras Zaborskis
29 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tanmay Mahapatra
1 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia ChiaoTzu Lee
1 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kei Long Cheung
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tanmay Mahapatra
4 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Håkan Källmén
19 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Kei Long Cheung
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Håkan Källmén
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
23 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12889-017-4189-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement