Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of Government and non-Government services

From: Improving the provision of services to young people from refugee backgrounds with comorbid mental health and substance use problems: addressing the barriers

 

Government

Non-Government

Total

Χ(df), p value

Effect size

Yes

n (%)

No or otherwise specified

n (%)

Yes

n (%)

No or otherwise specified

n (%)

n (%)

Chi-Square (df), significance

(Cramer’s V)

Does your service allow home visits?

21 (37.5%)

13 (23.2%)

19 (33.9%)

3 (5.4%)

56 (100%)

3.960 (1), p = .047*

.266

Do your clients have access to accredited interpreters?

33 (58.9%)

1 (1.78%) (no/unsure)

19 (33.9%)

3 (5.4%)(no/ unsure)

56 (100%)

2.304a (1), p = .129

Fisher’s exact test (2-tailed): p = .289

.203

Is your service adequately funded to provide treatment to refugee background clients?

8 (14.3%)

26 (46.4%)

9 (16.1%)

13 (23.2%)

56 (100%)

1.908 (1), p = .167

.185

Is your service adequately resourced to provide treatment to refugee background clients?

10 (17.9%)

24 (42.9%)

9 (16.1%)

13 (23.2%)

56 (100%)

.788 (1), p = .375

.119

Does your organisation collect data regarding if client is of refugee background?

5 (12.5%)

19 (47.5%)(no/ only country of birth)

8 (20%)

8 (20%) (no/ only country of birth)

40 (100%)

3.723 (1), p = .054

.305

Do your staff receive any training for working with CALD clients?

11 (27.5%)

13 (32.5%)

15 (37.5%)

1 (2.5%)

40 (100%)

9.689 (1), p = .002**

.492

Do your staff receive any training for working with refugee background clients?

3 (7.5%)

21 (52.5%)

7 (17.5%)

9 (22.5%)

40 (100%)

5a (1), p = .025*

Fisher’s exact (2-tailed) = .059

.354

Does your service employ 1 or more CALD/ cultural liaison/consultation or bi-cultural workers designated to work with CALD clients?

5 (12.5%)

19 (47.5%)

14 (35%)

2 (5%)

40 (100%)

17.109 (1), p = .000**

.654

In your opinion are the staff in your service adequately trained to provide treatment for refugee background clients?

0 (0%)

24 (60%) (No/There is room for improvement)

6 (15%)

10 (25%) (No/There is room for improvement)

40 (100%)

10.588a (1), p = .001**

Fisher’s exact test (2-tailed): p = .002**

.514

Do refugee clients and potential clients experience any barriers to accessing your treatment service?

17 (42.5%)

7 (17.5%)

10 (25%)

6 (15%)

40 (100%)

.304 (1), p = .581

.087

  1. Fisher’s exact test is only calculated where 1 or more cells have a count less than 5
  2. *p < .05 **p < .01
  3. a1 or more cells contain a value less than 5 breaching the assumption of Chi-square test of Independence