Skip to main content

Table 4 HPV vaccination intention: multivariable linear regression analyses of socio-demographic, social-psychological and other factors. HPV vaccination acceptability study among parents/guardians, in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2014

From: A longitudinal study on determinants of HPV vaccination uptake in parents/guardians from different ethnic backgrounds in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

 

Multivariablea

NL

SNA

MENA

Other

(n = 723)

(n = 126)

(n = 237)

(n = 223)

ß

95% CI

ß

95% CI

ß

95% CI

ß

95% CI

step 1

 Attitude

0.66

(0.57,0.75)

0.70

(0.48,0.91)

1.03

(0.88,1.17)

0.71

(0.55,0.86)

 Beliefs

0.36

(0.24,0.49)

0.28

(0.04,0.52)

  

0.27

(0.07,0.46)

 Risk perception when not vaccinating

    

0.11

(0.01,0.21)

  

 Relative effectiveness

0.11

(0, 0.22)

      

 Subjective norms

0.49

(0.35,0.63)

  

0.27

(0.08,0.46)

  

 Descriptive norms

  

0.13

(0.01,0.25)

0.12

(0.02,0.23)

0.14

(0.05,0.23)

step 2

 Ambivalence towards the decision

−0.08

(−0.13,−0.03)

      

 Information processing

−0.10

(−0.15,−0.04)

      

 Evaluation of the HPV information

0.23

(0.12,0.34)

0.43

(0.21,0.66)

  

0.25

(0.06,0.44)

Past experience with vaccinating older daughter against HPV

 Older daughter not

REF

     

REF

 

 Older daughter partially/fully vaccinated

0.92

(0.65,1.19)

    

0.94

(0.33,1.54)

 No older daughter

0.79

(0.53,1.05)

    

0.81

(0.21,1.40)

Past experience of someone close or him/herself with (prestage of) cervical cancer

 No

      

REF

 

 Yes

      

0.20

(0.04,0.36)

Education

 Low

REF

       

 Intermediate

0.14

(0.03,0.25)

      

 High

0.13

(0.01,0.24)

      

Religion

 No religion

REF

       

 Religious

−0.20

(−0.30,−0.10)

      

Multivariable model

R2

 

R2

 

R2

 

R2

 

 Step 1

0.73

 

0.61

 

0.75

 

0.63

 

 Step 1 + 2

0.77

 

0.66

   

0.66

 
  1. aThe multivariable analyses was executed by adding variables in two step: (step 1) proximal determinants, and (step 2) distal determinants. During each step backward selection was applied to reduce the number of determinants. Please note, that when executing a stepwise multivariable analyses, variables significant (p < 0.05) in one step may not be significant when variables are added during subsequent steps
  2. Abbrevations: R 2 R squared, is a number that indicates how well the data fit a linear regression model
  3. NL denotes participants with a Dutch ethnicity, SNA denotes participants with a Surinamese, Netherlands Antillean or Aruban ethnicity, MENA denotes participants with a Middle Eastern or North African ethnicity (including Turkish participants), Other denotes participants from all other ethnicities
  4. Interpretation of the coefficient of continuous determinants: if a determinant increases with one unit we expect to see an increase in intention with the coefficient specified for that determinant. For example, among the Dutch, if attitude increases with one unit, we expect intention to increase with 0.66
  5. Interpretation of the coefficient of categorical determinants: the intention to be vaccinated is ß higher or lower in the non-reference category when compared to the reference category. For example, overall, Dutch participants that are highly educated have an intention that is 0.13 higher (on the scale of −2 to +2) when compared to those participants with a low education