Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline socio-demographic characteristics, HPV vaccination intention, actual childhood vaccination and HPV vaccination uptake, by ethnic group of the parents/guardians, HPV vaccination acceptability study in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2014

From: A longitudinal study on determinants of HPV vaccination uptake in parents/guardians from different ethnic backgrounds in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Region of origin

 

NL

SNA

MENA

Other

Total

 

(n = 723)

(n = 126)

 

(n = 237)

 

(n = 223)

 

(n = 1309)

 

Socio-demographic characteristics

n

%

n

%

p vs NL

n

%

p vs NL

n

%

p vs NL

n

%

p overall

Gender

 Female

630

90%

108

89%

0.905

180

82%

0.002

190

89%

0.863

1108

88%

0.017

 Male

73

10%

13

11%

 

40

18%

 

23

11%

 

149

12%

 

Age

Median (IQR)

46

(43–49)

43

(39–47)

<0.001

42

(37–47)

<0.001

45

(41–48)

<0.001

45

(42–48)

<0.001

  ≤ 43 year

203

29%

61

51%

<0.001

119

58%

<0.001

86

42%

0.004

469

38%

<0.001

 44–47 year

253

36%

32

27%

 

41

20%

 

63

30%

 

389

32%

 

  ≥ 48 year

238

34%

27

23%

 

45

22%

 

58

28%

 

368

30%

 

Educationa

 Low

204

29%

71

60%

<0.001

137

65%

<0.001

80

38%

0.033

492

40%

<0.001

 Intermediate

255

37%

34

29%

 

43

20%

 

61

29%

 

393

32%

 

 High

236

34%

13

11%

 

32

15%

 

67

32%

 

348

28%

 

Religion

 No religion

515

74%

19

16%

<0.001

11

5%

<0.001

94

46%

<0.001

639

52%

<0.001

 Protestantismb

105

15%

50

42%

 

13

6%

 

41

20%

 

209

17%

 

 Catholicismc

67

10%

17

14%

 

19

9%

 

40

20%

 

143

12%

 

 Islam

2

0%

16

13%

 

168

80%

 

13

6%

 

199

16%

 

 Other

6

1%

17

14%

 

0

0%

 

16

8%

 

39

3%

 

Language used to complete the questionnaire

 Dutch

723

100%

126

100%

N.A.

194

82%

<0.001

199

89%

<0.001

1242

95%

<0.001

 Another language than Dutchd

0

0%

0

0%

 

43

18%

 

24

11%

 

67

5%

 

Received help to complete the questionnaire

 Did not receive help

649

93%

104

86%

0.011

124

57%

<0.001

160

75%

<0.001

1037

83%

<0.001

 Received helpe

50

7%

17

14%

 

94

43%

 

54

25%

 

215

17%

 

Way of completing the questionnaire

 On paper

401

55%

70

56%

0.985

158

67%

0.002

137

61%

0.115

766

59%

0.015

 Online

322

45%

56

44%

 

79

33%

 

86

39%

 

543

41%

 

Intention (5 point-scale, range −2 to 2)

 Mean (SD)

1.30

1.17

1.33

0.92

0.850

0.68

1.30

<0.001

1.31

0.97

0.903

1.20

1.17

<0.001

n

%

n

%

 

n

%

 

n

%

 

n

%

 

HPV vaccination status

 No vaccination

84

13%

16

16%

<0.001

72

41%

<0.001

33

17%

0.031

205

18%

<0.001

 One vaccination

22

3%

13

13%

 

13

7%

 

13

7%

 

61

5%

 

 Two vaccinations

539

84%

71

71%

 

92

52%

 

146

76%

 

848

76%

 

Infant, toddler and preschool children vaccinationf

 Not all

13

2%

7

7%

0.004

5

3%

0.515

17

9%

<0.001

42

4%

<0.001

 All

632

98%

93

93%

 

172

97%

 

175

91%

 

1072

96%

 

School-age vaccinationg

 Not all

24

4%

5

5%

0.538

6

3%

0.835

14

7%

0.031

49

4%

0.169

 All

621

96%

95

95%

 

171

97%

 

178

93%

 

1065

96%

 

Overall childhood vaccination statush

 Not all

24

4%

8

8%

0.050

8

5%

0.626

20

10%

<0.001

60

5%

0.002

 All

621

96%

92

92%

 

169

95%

 

172

90%

 

1054

95%

 
  1. * p-values of categorical variables are based on Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables, p-values for continuous variables when comparing one of the “region of origin” categories with the Dutch based on the t-test p-values for continuous variables overall are based on the Kruskall-Wallis test. For calculation of the p-values missing categories were excluded
  2. aEducation was based on the highest level of education and categorized into low (no education, primary school), intermediate (lower general secondary school, higher general secondary school, or secondary vocational school) and high (university-preparatory school, polytechnic, or university)
  3. bIncludes all Christian religions not belonging to the Catholic category
  4. cIncludes Coptic Christian and Greek- orthodox
  5. d Other languages used were Turkish (n = 20), English (n = 43), Arabic (n = 3) or Twi (n = 1). Written questionnaire was available in Dutch, English and Turkish
  6. eParticipants indicated to have received help to complete the questionnaire, i.e. partner (n = 48), daughter/son (n = 144) or different (n = 23)
  7. fGirl is vaccinated for all vaccinations given between 0 and 4 years of age (without exceptions), which are DTaP: diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine; HiB: Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine; MMR: measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (NB; PCV: pneumococcal conjugate vaccine -- > was introduced in 2006 and therefore not applicable for this cohort.)
  8. gGirl is vaccinated for all vaccinations given at 9 years of age (without exceptions), which are DTP: diphtheria-tetanus vaccine; MMR: measles-mumps-rubella vaccine
  9. hOverall vaccination status between 0 and 9 years (HPV vaccination is offered at the age of 12–13 years)
  10. Data are missing for gender (n = 52), age (n = 83), education (n = 76), religion (n = 80), received help (n = 57) and intention (n = 20). Data are missing for childhood and HPV vaccination status of those girls whose parents/guardians did not consent to obtain their vaccination status from Praeventis, the national database for monitoring the childhood vaccinations in the Netherlands)
  11. Abbreviations: IQR interquartile range, DPTP diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and poliomyelitis, MMR measles, mumps and rubella, HPV human papillomavirus, SD standard deviation. NL denotes participants with a Dutch ethnicity, SNA denotes participants with a Surinamese, Netherlands Antillean or Aruban ethnicity, MENA denotes participants with a Middle Eastern or North African ethnicity (including Turkish participants), Other denotes participants from all other ethnicities.
  12. p-values/significance levels are indicated in the columns "p vs NL" and "p overall". The values thatare significant at a level p < 0.05 are now indicated in bold