Skip to main content

Table 3 Contribution of the Demand-Control-Support and the Effort-Reward Imbalance models to income inequalities in psychological distress among men

From: Psychosocial work factors and social inequalities in psychological distress: a population-based study

 

Model I

Model II

Model III

Model IV

Model V

Model VI

 

Age-adjusted

Model I + Psychological demand

Model I + Job control

Model I + Social support

Model I + Reward

Model I + Job control, reward and social support

Contributiona % (95% CI)

REF

−24 (−40;−6)

9 (−3; 20)

14 (−3; 24)

24 (9; 38)

23 (5; 40)

Mean differences (95% CI)

 Household income ($/year)

 ≥100 000

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

REF

 60 000–99 999

0.32 (−0.10; 0.74)

0.61 (0.21; 1.01)**

0.28 (−0.13; 0.70)

0.25 (−0.16; 0.67)

0.19 (−0.22; 0.61)

0.22 (−0.20; 0.63)

 40 000–59 999

0.62 (0.16; 1.07)**

0.93 (0.49; 1.37)**

0.56 (0.10; 1.03)*

0.55 (0.10; 1.01)*

0.32 (−0.13; 0.78)

0.39 (−0.07; 0.85)

 0–39 999

1.26 (0.79; 1.73)***

1.56 (1.11; 2.02)***

1.15 (0.66; 1.63)***

1.09 (0.62; 1.55)***

0.95 (0.48; 1.42)***

0.96 (0.48; 1.45)***

 Psychological demand (tertiles)

 0–7.2

 

REF

    

 7.3–10

 

0.92 (0.59; 1.26)***

    

 >10

 

2.44 (2.05; 2.83)***

    

 Job control (tertiles)

 ≥25

  

REF

  

REF

 21–24.9

  

−0.04 (−0.41; 0.32)

  

−0.20 (−0.57; 0.18)

 0–20.9

  

0.46 (0.06; 0.85)*

  

0.00 (−0.42; 0.42)

 Social support at work

 ≥56

   

REF

 

REF

 48–55

   

−0.01 (−0.38; 0.36)

 

−0.21 (−0.61; 0.19)

 0–47

   

1.28 (0.89; 1.68)***

 

0.65 (0.19; 1.11)**

 Working alone

   

0.35 (−0.48; 1.18)

 

−0.15 (−1.10; 0.79)

 Reward (tertiles)

 >16

    

REF

REF

 14–16

    

0.30 (−0.07; 0.66)

0.19 (−0.20; 0.58)

 0–13

    

1.71 (0.34; 2.08)***

1.37 (0.94; 1.80)***

  1. *p-value <0.05, **p-value <0.01, ***p-value <0.001
  2. aContribution calculated with this formula, (MDbasic – MDadjusted)/(MDbasic), where MDbasic = Mean differences for age-adjusted models and MDadjusted = Mean differences for models adjusted for work variables at each steps for the 0–39 999$ per year category of household income. Jackknife method was used to calculate 95% IC of the contributions