Table 4 OH professionals’ within CoP (n = 8) agreement with statements on context, satisfaction and feasibility of the process
Statements | Agreement n (%) |
|---|---|
Context | |
My involvement within the guideline development group is supported by my colleagues | 4 (57%) |
My involvement within the guideline development group is supported by my boss | 4 (50%) |
Have you received good economical prerequisites for participating in the guideline development group | 7 (87.5%) |
Have you received good prerequisites regarding time to be able to actively participate in the guideline development between meetings | 3 (37.5%) |
Satisfaction | |
The task of the guideline development group is clear and understandable | 5 (62.5%) |
The presentations given during the meetings have been interesting | 8 (100%) |
The presentations are a necessary component of the guideline development process | 8 (100%) |
Overall I am satisfied with the meetings we have had | 5 (62.5%) |
A multi-professional set-up of the guideline development group is necessary for the development of the guideline | 7 (87.5%) |
By participating in the guideline development group my knowledge of evidence-based methods has increased | 8 (100%) |
The work done within the guideline development group has led to the development of the guideline | 8 (100%) |
I feel that I am an active member of the group | 8 (100%) |
I am satisfied with the topic (management of LBP) of the guideline | 4 (57%) |
Being part of the guideline development group has been valuable for developing practices within the OHS | 8 (100%) |
The work done within the guideline development group has lived up to my expectations | 4 (50%) |
Feasibility | |
The guideline development group has a good working method for the development of guidelines? | 6 (75%) |
The time-scheduling (i.e. frequency, duration) of the meetings has worked well | 1 (12.5%) |
It is possible for me to combine the task of the guideline development group with my work at the OHS? | 7 (87.5%) |