This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessment of the ecological bias of seven aggregate social deprivation indices
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 June 2016
Accepted: 28 December 2016
Published: 17 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|16 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hung Wong|
|19 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emanuela Dreassi|
|22 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Josephine Bryere|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emanuela Dreassi|
|14 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Exeter|
|23 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Josephine Bryere|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|17 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12889-016-4007-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.