Skip to main content

Table 2 Multivariable binary logistic regression models comparing characteristics of participants who agreed with each proposition about ‘favourable’ or ‘unfavourable’ impacts due to Alcohol Management Plans (AMPs) against those who disagreed (reference category) in a sample of 1211 residents of 10 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) communities in a survey conducted in Queensland (Australia) in 2014–15

From: Alcohol management plans in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) Australian communities in Queensland: community residents have experienced favourable impacts but also suffered unfavourable ones

a) Participants who agreed with each proposition about ‘favourable’ impacts

  

Children safer

Personal safety improved

Violence against women reduced

Violence reduced generally

School attendance improved

Community a better place to live

More awareness of alcohol harms

Variable name

f1

f2

f3

f4

f5

f6

f7

 Gender

Male

1.0 (0.9, 1.1)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

1.1 (0.8, 1.4)

1.0 (0.8, 1.2)

1.1 (0.9, 1.4)

1.0 (0.8, 1.4)

1.0 (0.7, 1.4)

 Age group

18–24

0.5 (0.3, 1.1)

0.8 (0.4, 1.5)

0.7 (0.4, 1.2)

0.9 (0.5, 1.7)

0.6 (0.3, 1.0)*

0.7 (0.5, 1.2)

1.1 (0.5, 2.4)

25–44

0.6 (0.3, 1.3)

0.5 (0.3, 1.1)

0.7 (0.4, 1.4)

0.9 (0.4, 1.7)

0.6 (0.3, 1.0)

0.5 (0.3, 0.9)*

0.8 (0.4, 1.7)

45–64

0.6 (0.3, 1.2)

0.5 (0.3, 1.0)*

0.7 (0.4, 1.3)

0.8 (0.4, 1.4)

0.5 (0.3, 1.0)

0.6 (0.4, 0.8)*

0.9 (0.6, 1.5)

65 and over†

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

 Resident ≥ 6 years

1.2 (0.8, 1.6)

1.6 (1.1, 2.3)*

1.5 (1.0, 2.3)*

1.3 (0.9, 1.9)

1.0 (0.7, 1.3)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

1.4 (1.0, 1.8)*

 Indigenous

1.1 (0.6, 2.1)

0.6 (0.4, 1.1)

1.1 (0.5, 2.5)

1.0 (0.5, 2.1)

1.6 (1.1, 2.5)*

0.7 (0.4, 1.2)

1.3 (0.6, 3.0)

 Current drinker

1.3 (1.2, 1.5)*

1.0 (0.7, 1.5)

1.1 (0.8, 1.3)

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

1.2 (0.9, 1.6)

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

1.0 (0.8, 1.2)

b) Participants who agreed with each proposition about ‘unfavourable’ impacts

  

Increased criminalisation

Cannabis increased

Binge drinking increased

Discrimination felt or experienced

Police can’t stop all alcohol

Alcohol availability not reduced

People not drinking less

Variable name

u4

u1

u3

u6

u5

u7

u8

 Gender

Male

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

0.8 (0.6, 0.9)*

0.8 (0.6, 1.1)

1.0 (0.7, 1.3)

0.8 (0.6, 1.1)

0.9 (0.7, 1.2)

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

 Age group

18–24

0.5 (0.2, 1.9)

2.0 (1.2, 3.3)*

1.0 (0.4, 2.4)

1.8 (1.2, 2.9)*

1.3 (0.5, 3.3)

0.7 (0.4, 1.0)

0.8 (0.5, 1.3)

25–44

0.8 (0.3, 2.3)

2.7 (1.6, 4.4)*

1.1 (0.5, 2.2)

1.9 (1.3, 2.7)*

1.7 (1.0, 2.9)*

0.6 (0.3, 1.1)

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

45–64

0.7 (0.2, 1.9)

2.4 (1.3, 4.4)*

0.9 (0.4, 2.0)

1.8 (1.1, 2.8)*

1.8 (1.0, 3.3)

0.6 (0.3, 1.2)

1.2 (0.7, 2.0)

65 and over†

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

 Resident ≥ 6 years

2.5 (1.3, 5.0)*

1.1 (0.8, 1.6)

1.5 (1.1, 2.1)*

1.2 (0.8, 1.6)

1.0 (0.7, 1.5)

0.8 (0.5, 1.1)

0.7 (0.4, 1.1)

 Indigenous

1.5 (0.8, 3.0)

0.3 (0.1, 0.7)*

0.7 (0.5, 1.0)

1.2 (0.6, 2.5)

0.4 (0.2, 0.6)*

0.9 (0.5, 1.5)

0.5 (0.4, 0.7)*

 Current drinker

0.9 (0.5, 1.5)

1.1 (0.8, 1.5)

0.7 (0.4, 1.0)*

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

1.1 (0.7, 1.7)

1.0 (0.9, 1.2)

0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

  1. *p < 0.05
  2. † reference category