Variable name | Propositions (to avoid conditioned responses propositions were arranged in the survey according to the order specified by the number enclosed in brackets) | Proportion of participants who ‘agree’ (n responding) | p* |
---|---|---|---|
‘Favourable’ impacts | |||
f1 | The AMP has helped make children safer in this community (6) | 56% (1007) | <0.001 |
f2 | The AMP has made people more safe in this community (11) | 53% (1019) | 0.097 |
f3 | The AMP has reduced violence against women in this community (4) | 49% (1017) | 0.363 |
f4 | Since the AMP, violence has gone down in this community (5) | 53% (1072) | 0.024 |
f5 | Since the AMP, school attendance has gone up in this community (7) | 66% (899) | <0.001 |
f6 | The AMP has been good for this community and made it a better place to live (1) | 54% (1026) | 0.012 |
f7 | People are more aware of harmful effects of alcohol/drinking now (since the AMP) (2) | 71% (1057) | <0.001 |
‘Unfavourable’ impacts | |||
u4 | The AMP has caused more people to get fined, criminal records and convictions (3) | 90% (1064) | <0.001 |
u1 | There is more (not so much) gunjah being smoked in this community since the AMP (12) † | 69% (944) | <0.001 |
u3 | There is more “binge drinking” now than before the AMP (13) | 73% (1006) | <0.001 |
u6 | The AMP has discriminated against some people (14) | 77% (1026) | <0.001 |
u5 | Police can’t (can) enforce the AMP effectively and stop the alcohol coming in (9) † | 51% (1098) | 0.365 |
u7 | The AMP has not (has) reduced the alcohol people can get in this community (8) † | 58% (1118) | <0.001 |
u8 | The AMP has not (has) helped people change their drinking and they are (not) drinking less (10) † | 56% (1076) | <0.001 |