Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and adjusted analysis of variables associated with high PTE scores among adolescent women (n = 442)

From: Prevalence, type, and correlates of trauma exposure among adolescent men and women in Soweto, South Africa: implications for HIV prevention

 

Low PTE score

High PTE score

p-value

High PTE score vs. Low PTE score

Variables

n

%

n

%

Wilcoxon/Chisq

OR

95% CI

 

AOR

95% CI

Socio-demographic characteristics

Age

17

16,18

18

16,18

0.182

1.10

0.97

1.24

Not Selected

Years lived in Soweto

 < 5 years

22

9.0

22

11.3

0.511

Ref

     

 ≥ 5 years

28

11.5

27

13.9

 

0.96

0.44

2.13

   

 Since birth

194

79.5

146

74.9

 

0.75

0.40

1.41

   

Ethnicity

 Zulu

104

42.5

75

38.1

0.764

Ref

     

 Xhosa

29

11.8

24

12.2

 

1.15

0.62

2.13

   

 Sotho

48

19.6

36

18.3

 

1.04

0.62

1.76

   

 Tswana

29

11.8

30

15.2

 

1.43

0.79

2.59

   

 Other

35

14.3

32

16.2

 

1.27

0.72

2.23

   

Employment

 Student

217

89.7

168

85.3

0.379

Ref

     

 Unemployed

19

7.85

22

11.17

 

1.50

0.78

2.85

   

 Employed

6

2.5

7

3.6

 

1.51

0.50

4.57

   

Housing

 House owned by family

184

75.1

143

72.6

0.577

Ref

     

 House rented by family/Other

6

2.5

3

1.5

 

0.64

0.16

2.62

   

 RDP house/Shack

55

22.45

51

25.89

 

1.19

0.77

1.85

   

Food Insecurity

 Low

77

31.4

33

16.8

<.001

Ref

  

Ref

  

 Medium

71

29.0

44

22.3

 

1.45

0.83

2.52

1.49

0.84

2.65

 High

97

39.6

120

60.9

 

2.89

1.77

4.70

2.57

1.55

4.26

Household ever Received Social Grant

 No

112

46.1

72

36.7

0.048

Ref

  

Not Selected

  

 Yes

131

53.9

124

63.3

 

1.47

1.00

2.16

  

Sexual behaviour and HIV variables

HIV testing history

 No

139

57.0

88

44.7

0.010

Ref

  

Not Selected

  

 Yes

105

43.0

109

55.3

 

1.64

1.12

2.39

  

HIV Result

 Positive

3

1.2

3

1.5

0.131

Ref

     

 Negative

102

41.6

100

50.8

 

0.98

0.19

4.97

   

 Unknown

140

57.1

94

47.7

 

0.67

0.13

3.40

   

Sex Ever

 No

142

58.0

80

40.6

<.001

Ref

  

Not included*

  

 Yes

103

42.0

117

59.4

 

2.02

1.38

2.95

  

STI or STI symptomology

 No

80

32.7

79

40.1

<.001

Ref

     

 Yes

23

9.4

38

19.3

 

1.67

0.91

3.06

   

 Never had sex

142

58.0

80

40.6

 

0.57

0.38

0.86

   

Sexually Active L6M

 No

41

16.9

32

16.3

<.001

Ref

     

 Yes

60

24.7

84

42.9

 

1.79

1.02

3.17

   

 Never had sex

142

58.4

80

40.8

 

0.72

0.42

1.24

   

Inconsistent condom use

 Never had sex

142

59.7

80

41.0

<.001

Ref

  

Ref

  

 No

52

21.9

44

22.6

 

1.50

0.92

2.44

1.59

0.96

2.63

 Yes

44

18.5

71

36.4

 

2.86

1.80

4.56

2.69

1.66

4.37

More than 1 partner in L6M

 No

49

20.2

68

34.9

<.001

Ref

  

Not included*

  

 Yes

11

4.5

15

7.7

 

0.98

0.42

2.32

  

 Never had sex/Sexually inactive

183

75.3

112

57.4

 

0.44

0.29

0.68

  

Substance use and mental health variables

Alcohol Use in the L6M

 No

102

42.0

61

31.1

0.019

Ref

  

Not Selected

  

 Yes

141

58.0

135

68.9

 

1.60

1.08

2.38

   

Probable Depression

 No

176

71.8

105

53.3

<.001

Ref

  

Ref

  

 Yes (score ≥ 24)

69

28.2

92

46.7

 

2.23

1.51

3.32

2.00

1.31

3.03

Incarceration history

 No

226

97.4

162

93.1

0.037

Ref

  

Not Selected

  

 Yes

6

2.6

12

6.9

 

2.79

1.03

7.59

  

Drug use ever in L6M (excluding marijuana use)

 No

239

97.6

192

97.5

0.952

Ref

     

 Yes

6

2.5

5

2.5

 

1.04

0.31

3.45

   
  1. Note: AORs in bold are significant (<.05)
  2. Abbreviations: CI confidence intervals; OR odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, CES-D center for epidemiologic studies- depression scale, RDP reconstruction and development programme, STI sexually transmitted infection, HIV human immunodeficiency virus
  3. *Not included due to Collinearity