Skip to main content

Table 4 Frequency (and percentage) of participants’ reports of physical appearance: by region within grade level at recruitment within year

From: Trends in body image of adolescent females in metropolitan and non-metropolitan regions: a longitudinal study

Year

Grade level at recruitment

Region

‘Better looking than average’

‘About average’

‘Worse looking than average’

Total

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

2008

7

Metropolitan

106

35.5

155

51.8

38

12.7

299

100.0

Non-metropolitan

24

26.1

51

55.4

17

18.5

92

100.0

11

Metropolitan

32

25.2

71

55.9

24

18.9

127

100.0

Non-metropolitan

24

33.8

41

57.7

6

8.5

71

100.0

2009

7

Metropolitan

67

25.9

143

55.2

49

18.9

259

100.0

Non-metropolitan

16

19.5

52

63.4

14

17.1

82

100.0

11

Metropolitan

21

24.1

52

59.8

14

16.1

87

100.0

Non-metropolitan

17

27.4

40

64.5

5

8.1

62

100.0

2010

7

Metropolitan

63

28.8

120

54.8

36

16.4

219

100.0

Non-metropolitan

10

13.9

42

58.3

20

27.8

72

100.0

11

Metropolitan

12

7.1

120

71.4

36

21.4

168

100.0

Non-metropolitan

17

41.5

22

53.7

2

4.9

41

100.0

Total

  

409

25.9

909

57.6

261

16.5

1579

100.0

  1. Note: There were no statistically significant main effects for year, region or grade level, and no significant interactions