Skip to main content

Table 2 Prediction of daily dog walking intention-behavior profiles using multi-process action control variables and dog size

From: Understanding action control of daily walking behavior among dog owners: a community survey

 

Intention-Behavior Profiles

Correlation with Discriminant Function

Univariate Follow-Up F2,218

Post Hocs

 

Non-intenders

(n = 59)

Unsuccessful Intenders

(n = 75)

Successful Intenders

(n = 91)

Dog Breed Size

2.05 (0.87)

1.89 (0.86)

2.34 (0.77)

.28

6.33*

NI,UI < SI

Outcome Expectations (Human)

3.98 (0.77)

3.92 (0.83)

4.28 (0.78)

.14

NA

NA

Outcome Expectation (Canine)

4.60 (0.52)

4.65 (0.47)

4.81 (0.40)

.07

NA

NA

Affective Judgements

4.10 (0.82)

4.35 (0.59)

4.69 (0.41)

.33

18.43*

NI < UI < SI

Perceived Capability

4.48 (0.98)

4.73 (0.52)

4.76 (0.61)

-.03

NA

NA

Perceived Opportunity

4.27 (0.84)

4.54 (0.61)

4.62 (0.67)

.03

NA

NA

Behavioral Regulation

2.73 (0.93)

3.04 (0.93)

3.42 (0.92)

.33

10.27*

NI < UI < SI

Automaticity

3.00 (1.02)

3.63 (1.09)

3.96 (0.98)

.38

15.65*

NI < UI < SI

Identity

3.33 (1.01)

3.49 (0.85)

4.07 (0.63)

.22

17.53*

NI,UI < SI

  1. Note: * = p < 0.01. NI = non-intenders, UI = unsuccessful intenders, SI = successful intenders. NA = not applicable. Post hoc tests interpreted as p < 0.05 and d > 0.30 based on the recommended minimum effect size for social science data (Ferguson [43]; Cohen [44])