From: Household sanitation facilities and women’s risk of non-partner sexual violence in India
Odds ratio | ||
---|---|---|
(95 % CI) | p-value | |
Sanitation facilities | ||
Toilet | 1 | NA |
Pit | 1 · 44 | 0 · 01 |
(1 · 11 – 1 · 86) | ||
Open air | 1 · 27 | 0 · 004 |
(1 · 08 – 1 · 49) | ||
Respondent’s demographic characteristics | ||
Education | 1 · 00 | 0 · 87 |
(0 · 99 – 1 · 01) | ||
Age | 0 · 97 | <0 · 001 |
(0 · 96 – 0 · 98) | ||
Relationship status | ||
Never married | 1 | NA |
Married | 5 · 60 | 0 · 01 |
(1 · 45 – 21 · 70) | ||
Widowed | 3 · 40 | 0 · 12 |
(0 · 73 – 15 · 79) | ||
Not living together | 4 · 57 | 0 · 06 |
(0 · 95 – 21 · 94) | ||
Caste/ religion | ||
Upper caste Hindu | 1 | NA |
SC/ST Hindu | 1 · 13 | 0 · 17 |
(0 · 95 – 1 · 35) | ||
OBC Hindu | 1 · 23 | 0 · 02 |
(1 · 03 – 1 · 47) | ||
Lower class Muslim | 1 · 59 | <0 · 001 |
(1 · 23 – 2 · 05) | ||
Forward class Muslim | 1 · 40 | 0 · 003 |
(1 · 12 – 1 · 76) | ||
Other SC/ST, Christian, Buddhist | 1 · 48 | 0 · 02 |
(1 · 06 – 2 · 05) | ||
Other | 1 · 31 | 0 · 08 |
(0 · 97 – 1 · 76) | ||
City size | ||
Mega city | 1 | NA |
Large city | 1 · 11 | 0 · 57 |
(0 · 78 – 1 · 58) | ||
Small city | 1 · 35 | 0 · 09 |
(0 · 96 – 1 · 90) | ||
Large town | 1 · 77 | 0 · 01 |
(1 · 15 – 2 · 73) | ||
Small town | 1 · 15 | 0 · 45 |
(0 · 81 – 1 · 63) | ||
Rural | 1 · 19 | 0 · 26 |
(0 · 88 – 1 · 61) | ||
Geographic region | ||
North | 1 | NA |
North-central | 1 · 12 | 0 · 29 |
(0 · 91 – 1 · 37) | ||
North-east | 0 · 89 | 0 · 44 |
(0 · 65 – 1 · 21) | ||
East | 0 · 89 | 0 · 27 |
(0 · 72 – 1 · 10) | ||
West | 1 · 13 | 0 · 30 |
(0 · 90 – 1 · 43) | ||
South | 0 · 59 | <0 · 001 |
(0 · 47 – 0 · 74) | ||
Household assets | ||
Electricity in home | 1 · 08 | 0 · 34 |
Roof material | (0 · 92 – 1 · 26) | |
Natural | 1 | NA |
Man-made, semi-permanent | 0 · 89 | 0 · 31 |
(0 · 72 – 1 · 11) | ||
Man-made, permanent | 1 · 05 | 0 · 59 |
(0 · 89 – 1 · 23) | ||
Constant | 0 · 03 | <0 · 001 |
(0 · 01 – 0 · 14) |