Skip to main content

Table 3 Tests of potential moderators of the parent–child physical activity relationship as measured by pedometers

From: A cross-sectional study of the relationship between parents’ and children’s physical activity

Potential moderators

Moderator categories

Bivariate correlations

Test of moderationa

  

n

r

B (SE)a

r partial

p-value

Child gender

Girls

289

.30***

−0.12 (.09)

-.06

.20

Boys

323

.23***

Parent gender

Fathers

97

.27*

0.5 (.11)

.02

.64

Mothers

515

.25***

Gender homogeneityb

Same gender

326

.22***

−0.07 (.09)

-.04

.44

Opposite gender

286

.30***

Child weight status

Non-overweight

476

.24***

.11 (.11)

.04

.31

Overweight/obese

136

.29**

Parent weight status

Non-overweight

339

.28***

−0.03 (.10)

-.01

.79

Overweight/obese

273

.20**

Weight status homogeneityc

Same weight status

372

.30***

0.05 (.10)

.02

.63

Opposite weight status

240

.17*

Household income

Low (<$80,000/year)

482

.28***

0.25 (.14)

.09

.07

High (>$80,000/year)

137

.13

Parent education

No graduate degree

526

.24***

0.38 (.16)

.11

.02

Graduate degree

86

.33**

Area-level SESd

Low (< mean)

336

.22***

0.00 (.00)

.07

.14

High (> mean)

276

.29***

  1. Note. *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001; SES = socioeconomic status; apotential moderators were tested one by one by adding an interaction term (parent steps*potential moderator) to a linear regression model where child steps was the criterion variable and parent steps, child and parent gender, child and parent weight status, education, household income, and area-level SES were predictor variables; bgender homogeneity was also added to the model as a predictor variable; cweight status homogeneity was also added to the model as a predictor variable; darea-level SES was tested as a continuous variable