Skip to main content

Table 6 Competing risk regression, age, sex and PIR-adjusted vs. full models for direct effect of race on mortality from major causes, NHANES IIIa

From: Racial disparities in adult all-cause and cause-specific mortality among us adults: mediating and moderating factors

 

Loge(HR)

95 % CI

P

Cardiovascular mortality

Age, sex, PIR-adjusted model b

 NHB vs. NHW

+0.22

(+0.07;+0.37)

0.005

 MA vs. NHW

−0.21

(-0.42;0.00)

0.05

Full model c

   

 NHB vs. NHW

+0.09

(-0.10;0.28)

0.33

 MA vs. NHW

−0.31

(-0.58;-0.04)

0.024

Neoplasms

Age, sex, PIR-adjusted model b

 NHB vs. NHW

+0.24

(+0.05;+0.44)

0.014

 Mexican-American vs. NHW

−0.33

(-0.60;-0.05)

0.021

Full model c

 NHB vs. NHW

+0.35

(+0.01;+0.68)

0.044

 MA vs. NHW

+0.21

(-0.23;0.64)

0.35

  1. Abbreviation: CI Confidence Interval, HEI Healthy Eating Index, HR Hazard Ratio, MA Mexican-American, MAR mean adequacy ratio, NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, NHB Non-Hispanic Black, NHW Non-Hispanic White, PIR Poverty Income Ratio
  2. aValues are the natural log of hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI with p-values, taking into account unequal probability of selection or sampling weights. Statistical significance is inferred from a 95 % CI not crossing the value of zero
  3. bThe age, sex and PIR adjusted model is presented here to be contrasted with the full model
  4. cThe full model adjusted for the same vector of covariates as in Model 8 (Table 5). Note that the point estimate of the HR can be computed as exp(β) where β = Loge(HR). The 95 % CI for the HR is computed as exp(β±1.96*SE(β)), whereby SE(β) = (UCLβ -LCLβ)/3.92