Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated difference in mean weight and estimated odds ratios between participants with excellent or very good health and participants with good, fair or poor health

From: The Australian longitudinal study on male health sampling design and survey weighting: implications for analysis and interpretation of clustered data

 

Adjustment for clustering?

Levels of sampling hierarchy used?

Adjustment for stratification?

Sample weights used?

Weight:

Excellent or very good health (vs good, fair or poor health): Difference (95 % CI)

Current smoker:

Excellent or very good health (vs good, fair or poor health): Odds Ratio (95 % CI)

A

No

None

No

No

−5.1 (−5.8 to −4.5)

0.39 (0.36 to 0.42)

B

No

None

Yes

No

−5.1 (−5.7 to −4.4)

0.39 (0.36 to 0.43)

C

No

None

No

Yes

−4.4 (−5.6 to −3.3)

0.42 (0.37 to 0.47)

D

No

None

Yes

Yes

−4.3 (−5.5 to −3.2)

0.42 (0.38 to 0.47)

E

Yes

SA1, SA2, household

No

No

−4.9 (−5.5 to −4.2)

NR

F

Yes

SA1, SA2, household

Yes

No

−4.8 (−5.5 to −4.2)

NR

G

Yes

SA1

Yes

Yes

−4.4 (−5.5 to −3.2)

0.42 (0.37 to 0.47)

H

Yes

SA1

Yes

No

−5.1 (−5.8 to −4.4)

0.39 (0.35 to 0.42)

I

Yes

SA2

Yes

Yes

−4.4 (−5.5 to −3.3)

0.42 (0.37 to 0.47)

J

Yes

SA2

Yes

No

−5.1 (−5.9 to −4.4)

0.39 (0.35 to 0.43)